The authors construct a statistical model with which to test whether
the regularity that democracy is more commonly found among wealthy
countries stems from a democratizing effect of high income or is due
entirely to other factors, such as the historical context, various
features of the institutional setting, and simultaneity with the
process of leadership change. Even after correcting for these many
other influences, the democratizing effect of income remains as a
statistically significant factor promoting the emergence of democratic
political institutions. The authors go on to find that leaders' risks
of losing power rise during their time in office and that these risks
are higher in more democratic countries.
The authors confirm the finding by Burkhart and Lewis-Beck that the
democracy-promoting effect of income is stronger among the European
countries. They suggest that high income has a more powerful
democratizing effect among the Southern European countries because it
interacts with pressure from major trading partners to democratize.
This suggests a revaluation of policies designed to foster the
replacement of authoritarian regimes by democratic ones through free
trade.
How is one to understand contentious acts that open channels of
participation while also making use of existing channels? Rightful
resistance is a partly institutionalized form of popular action that
employs laws, policies, and other established values to defy power
holders who have failed to live up to some ideal or who have not
implemented a popular measure. Analysis of opposition to cadre
misconduct in rural China, supported by evidence from the United
States, Norway, and South Africa, suggests that resistance can share a
common dynamic despite its occurrence in strikingly dissimilar
settings. Aggrieved individuals and groups turn to established
principles to anchor their defiance; use legitimating myths and
normative language to frame their claims; rely on existing statutes
and government commitments when leveling their charges; and locate and
mobilize advocates within officialdom. In differing contexts, a
combination of rights talk, legal tactics, and open confrontation may
induce power holders to surrender advantages in accord with principles
that usually favor them. The cases examined further suggest that
rightful resistance springs from rights consciousness and increases it
and, finally, that it may be more consequential than most "everyday
resistance" while remaining less risky than wholly uninstitutionalized
defiance.
Qualitative analysts have received stern warnings that the validity
of their studies may be undermined by selection bias. This article
provides an overview of this problem for qualitative researchers in
the field of international and comparative studies, focusing on
selection bias that may result from the deliberate selection of cases
by the investigator. Examples are drawn from studies of revolution,
international deterrence, the politics of inflation, international
terms of trade, economic growth, and industrial competitiveness. The
article first explores how insights about selection bias developed in
quantitative research can most productively be applied in qualitative
studies. The discussion considers why qualitative researchers need to
be concerned about selection bias, even if they do not care about the
generality of their findings, and it considers distinctive
implications of this form of bias for qualitative research, as in the
problem of what is labeled "complexification based on extreme cases."
The article then considers pitfalls in recent discussions of selection
bias in qualitative studies. These discussions at times get bogged
down in disagreements and misunderstandings over how the dependent
variable is conceptualized and what the appropriate frame of
comparison should be, issues that are crucial to the assessment of
bias within a given study. At certain points it becomes clear that the
real issue is not just selection bias, but a larger set of trade-offs
among alternative analytic goals.
Review title: Economic reform and political transition in Africa : the
quest for a politics of development.
Abstract:
The 1980s were bracketed by crises in Africa, as protracted economic
malaise was succeeded by a wave of political reform. Analysts have
sought to understand the sources of economic decline as well as the
political requisites for recovery in the region. Neoclassical and
structuralist analyses have been challenged by state-centric views of
economic change. The latter perspective emphasizes the need for
capable developmental states as a basis for long-term adjustment, but
a political theory of economic change is still lacking. Such a theory
must address the institutional foundations of growth, as well as the
shifting basis of social coalitions in African regimes. Political
liberalization suggests the possibility of a new setting for economic
reform, though the effects of political reform on institutions and
coalitions remain ambiguous, and democratization cannot be regarded as
a panacea for the region's developmental failure. Future research must
look more closely at the interests and structures in transitional
regimes, and scholars should adopt a more comparative vantage on
Africa's challenges of reform.
Review title: Not so silent migration : postwar migration to Western
Europe.
Abstract:
In the 1990s scholars working within the subfield of immigration
studies in Western Europe have advanced four major arguments. (1) In a
liberal era of global economic markets the capacity of states to
govern their territorial borders has significantly eroded. (2) The
widespread diffusion of liberal norms has severely inhibited the
ability of governments to execute a rational immigrant policy. (3) The
experience of mass immigration has transformed the boundaries of
national citizenship. And 4) postwar immigration has fostered the
surge of radical right-wing populist movements. This article evaluates
these arguments in light of the evidence presented in both the
collected scholarship under review and other select works. It
concludes by arguing the case for new scholarly initiatives to
synthesize and unify the separate literatures represented by the
volumes under review.